1995 Chrysler Neon vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Neon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Neon (131 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 61 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Neon (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Neon | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | Neon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5850 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1109 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
