1995 Chrysler Neon vs. 1967 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Neon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Neon. (131 HP @ 5850 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 111 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Neon (174 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1995 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Neon | 1967 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Neon | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5850 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1109 kg | 998 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2430 mm |
