1995 Chrysler Neon vs. 1982 Ford Monarch
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Neon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Monarch weights approximately 351 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1982 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 1995 Chrysler Neon has manual transmission. 1995 Chrysler Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Neon | 1982 Ford Monarch | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Monarch |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4122 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1109 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2800 mm |