1995 Chrysler Neon vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Neon. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chrysler Neon. (174 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Neon | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Neon | UTE |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |