1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 74 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 1955 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chrysler | Riley |
| Model | Sebring | RM A |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1236 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2870 mm |
