1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1962 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (140 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 659 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1995 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Sebring | 1962 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Sebring | Elite |
Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1215 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 66.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1319 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |