1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 176 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Sebring | EJ |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
