1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1976 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1976 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1976 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Belmont weights approximately 15 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1976 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 1976 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Sebring | Belmont |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
