1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1979 Zastava 132

To start off, 1995 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 224 kg more than 1979 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: