1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 145 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 1995 Chrysler Sebring has manual transmission. 1995 Chrysler Sebring will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Sebring | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | Tempo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |