1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Sebring | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Sebring | Maloo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |