1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1999 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Mercury Cougar is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1999 Mercury Cougar. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1999 Mercury Cougar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 176 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 1999 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | Sebring | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
