1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (155 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 102 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (218 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 1995 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Sebring | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2730 mm |
