1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Sebring. (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Sebring | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |