1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 682 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Sebring. (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 230 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2003 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotec |
| Model | Sebring | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 5499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
