1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Sebring. (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1995 Chrysler Sebring has manual transmission. 1995 Chrysler Sebring will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Sebring | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Sebring | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2298 cc |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |