1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2006 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2006 Nissan 1400 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2006 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan 1400 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2006 Nissan 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 2006 Nissan 1400 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Sebring | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1397 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5700 mm |
