1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Sebring. (155 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (218 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1995 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Sebring | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Sebring | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |
