1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2012 Fisker Karma

To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1221 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.

Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Chrysler Sebring 2012 Fisker Karma
Make Chrysler Fisker
Model Sebring Karma
Year Released 1995 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Horse Power 140 HP 0 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Single Speed
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1319 kg 2540 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4996 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1984 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1331 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 3160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 36 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]