1995 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chrysler Sebring (140 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Sebring | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Sebring | Pixo |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2360 mm |