1995 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. (117 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 770 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Voyager (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Chrysler Voyager | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Voyager | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 117 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
