1995 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro

To start off, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 4,943 cc, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro (741 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 624 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. (117 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 74 kg more than 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro.

Because 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro (900 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 650 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Lotec Testa de Oro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chrysler Voyager.

Compare all specifications: