1995 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 987 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Voyager | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | Voyager | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3628 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 640 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 2717 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |