1995 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Sentra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Sentra (140 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. (117 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 432 kg more than 2010 Nissan Sentra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chrysler Voyager (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Sentra. (199 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1995 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Voyager | Sentra |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 199 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4567 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1511 mm |