1995 Citroen AX vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen AX would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1995 Citroen AX. (48 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1995 Citroen AX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Citroen AX. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen AX | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | AX | C70 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2650 mm |