1995 Citroen C vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1995 Citroen C is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1995 Citroen C. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1995 Citroen C.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Citroen C. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1976 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Citroen C | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C | 66 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 952 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
