1995 Citroen Xantia vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1995 Citroen Xantia is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Citroen Xantia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Citroen Xantia (135 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Citroen Xantia should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Citroen Xantia weights approximately 490 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Citroen Xantia (180 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Citroen Xantia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen Xantia | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Citroen | Riley |
Model | Xantia | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1995 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |