1995 Citroen XM vs. 1962 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1995 Citroen XM is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Citroen XM weights approximately 784 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Citroen XM (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1995 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen XM | 1962 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | XM | Fronte |
Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2060 mm |