1995 Citroen XM vs. 2000 Mazda Demio

To start off, 2000 Mazda Demio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2000 Mazda Demio. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda Demio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Citroen XM weights approximately 324 kg more than 2000 Mazda Demio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Citroen XM (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda Demio. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda Demio.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Citroen XM 2000 Mazda Demio
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM Demio
Year Released 1995 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1323 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1284 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2400 mm