1995 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen XM would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1995 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1995 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1995 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Citroen XM. (168 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen XM | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | E-350 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 132 L |