1995 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen XM would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1995 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1995 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 426 kg more than 1995 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Citroen XM. (168 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Citroen XM. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1995 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1995 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen XM | 2004 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | XM | XJ |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 85 L |