1995 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen XM would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1995 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1995 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 469 kg more than 1995 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Citroen XM. (168 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen XM | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | XM | XK |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 553 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1753 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 75 L |