1995 Citroen XM vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1121 kg more than 1995 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Citroen XM (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1995 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen XM | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | XM | Livina |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 168 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 52 L |