1995 Citroen XM vs. 2009 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1995 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1995 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Citroen XM (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Fusion. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen XM | 2009 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | Fusion |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |