1995 Citroen XM vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,455 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1995 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1995 Citroen XM.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Outback (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Citroen XM. (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Citroen XM | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Citroen | Subaru |
Model | XM | Outback |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2455 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |