1995 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia (203 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (187 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 198 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Daewoo Arcadia | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Arcadia | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 3801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1392 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4660 mm |
