1995 Daewoo Brougham vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1995 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Brougham (108 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Brougham should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 450 kg more than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo Brougham | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Daewoo | Skoda |
Model | Brougham | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |