1995 Daewoo Brougham vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Brougham (108 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Brougham should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 45 kg more than 1995 Daewoo Brougham.
Because 1995 Daewoo Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Daewoo Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1995 Daewoo Brougham has manual transmission. 1995 Daewoo Brougham will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo Brougham | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | CU-X |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |