1995 Daewoo Brougham vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Brougham (108 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 484 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo Brougham | 2002 MCC Smart | |
Make | Daewoo | MCC |
Model | Brougham | Smart |
Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |