1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo No 1 (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1 should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Because 1953 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Daewoo No 1 (137 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm). This means 1995 Daewoo No 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Daewoo No 1 | 1953 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Daewoo | Triumph |
| Model | No 1 | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1247 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
