1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,050 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk (206 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Daewoo No 1 | 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
| Make | Daewoo | Studebaker |
| Model | No 1 | Silver Hawk |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3050 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
