1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 1968 Mazda R-100

To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.

Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Daewoo No 1 (137 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm). This means 1995 Daewoo No 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda R-100 has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda R-100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: