1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda 929 (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1979 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 929 (160 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 1979 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Daewoo No 1 | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
| Model | No 1 | 929 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
