1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1980 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (352 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Daewoo | Holden |
Model | No 1 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1995 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 5042 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |