1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (108 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 137 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Daewoo | Rover |
Model | No 1 | 200 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1589 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |