1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 1997 Volvo S90
To start off, 1997 Volvo S90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Volvo S90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo S90 (177 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo S90 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1997 Volvo S90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Volvo S90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo S90 (260 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 1997 Volvo S90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 1997 Volvo S90 has manual transmission. 1997 Volvo S90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 1997 Volvo S90 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | No 1 | S90 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2922 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |