1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (346 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Daewoo | Cadillac |
| Model | No 1 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3563 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 346 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
