1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Daewoo | Jaguar |
Model | No 1 | XJ |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2968 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 293 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |