1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Roadster (140 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | No 1 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 140 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |