1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (130 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (310 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | No 1 | 6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |